Skip to main content
Solved

What employee content drives course recommendations?

  • June 16, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 16 views

Do we have clarity on what information drives course recommendations? I know skill gaps play a role, but does it also look at locations, education, job titles, job descriptions, etc.?

Best answer by dkreiger

Hi ​@beth.steffens, Excuse me for the wait here. 

Course recommendations are primarily skills-driven, but not exclusively skill-gap driven. Eightfold considers the employee’s profile skills, proficiency, skill gaps, skill goals, career/role interests, current role and experience, plus organizational context such as seniority, job family/function, business unit, job code, and location. It also uses course metadata — including skills, difficulty, language, target audience, and inferred metadata from course titles/descriptions — and filters out completed courses. Education may contribute to the employee profile context, but the clearest documented primary signals are skills/proficiency, role/career context, and organizational/course metadata. 
 

What drives course recommendations

The current model looks at:

  • Employee skills and skill proficiency — current skills, profile skills, self/manager ratings, or seniority-based fallback where proficiency is missing
  • Skill gaps — where an employee’s proficiency is below what their role or target role requires
  • Skill goals / learning goals — skills the employee explicitly marks as goals
  • Role goals / career interests — courses aligned to skills needed for aspired future roles 
  • Current role and prior experience — the system considers current role, prior job experience, and existing skills
  • Seniority / difficulty alignment — course difficulty is matched to the employee’s current proficiency or seniority context, so learners are not shown only overly basic or overly advanced content
  • Job function, business unit, job family, and job code — used as organizational context / target-audience matching so courses are better aligned to the employee’s real work context
  • Location — included in the improved model’s employee-attribute matching/calibration 
  • Course metadata — skills covered, difficulty, expected proficiency, course type, duration, language, target audience, and metadata inferred from course title/description when explicit metadata is incomplete
  • Course attendance / completion data — completed courses are filtered out; historical attendance can help calibrate which types of employees a course is relevant for 
  • Language preference — in Career Navigator learning recommendations, preferred-language courses are surfaced first, with English as fallback

On the specific attributes you asked about

Attribute

Used?

Notes

Skill gaps

Yes

Core signal; especially for Skill Gaps feed and Career Navigator course suggestions

Location

Yes

Used in improved recommendation calibration / matching

Education

Some evidence, but not emphasized in latest docs

A discovery transcript mentions education among profile attributes considered, but the latest product/admin docs emphasize role, experience, skills, proficiency, interests, and org context more strongly

Job title / current role

Yes

Current role/title and career-interest roles influence recommendations

Job descriptions

Indirectly

The docs don’t frame raw job descriptions as a primary direct signal for course recs. Instead, role skills/role context from Talent Design/job architecture and course title/description-derived skills are used

Job family/function / BU / job code

Yes

Explicitly used for organizational context and course calibration

Course descriptions

Yes

AI can infer course skills and difficulty from course titles/descriptions when metadata

1 reply

dkreiger
Community Manager
  • Community Manager
  • Answer
  • August 10, 2026

Hi ​@beth.steffens, Excuse me for the wait here. 

Course recommendations are primarily skills-driven, but not exclusively skill-gap driven. Eightfold considers the employee’s profile skills, proficiency, skill gaps, skill goals, career/role interests, current role and experience, plus organizational context such as seniority, job family/function, business unit, job code, and location. It also uses course metadata — including skills, difficulty, language, target audience, and inferred metadata from course titles/descriptions — and filters out completed courses. Education may contribute to the employee profile context, but the clearest documented primary signals are skills/proficiency, role/career context, and organizational/course metadata. 
 

What drives course recommendations

The current model looks at:

  • Employee skills and skill proficiency — current skills, profile skills, self/manager ratings, or seniority-based fallback where proficiency is missing
  • Skill gaps — where an employee’s proficiency is below what their role or target role requires
  • Skill goals / learning goals — skills the employee explicitly marks as goals
  • Role goals / career interests — courses aligned to skills needed for aspired future roles 
  • Current role and prior experience — the system considers current role, prior job experience, and existing skills
  • Seniority / difficulty alignment — course difficulty is matched to the employee’s current proficiency or seniority context, so learners are not shown only overly basic or overly advanced content
  • Job function, business unit, job family, and job code — used as organizational context / target-audience matching so courses are better aligned to the employee’s real work context
  • Location — included in the improved model’s employee-attribute matching/calibration 
  • Course metadata — skills covered, difficulty, expected proficiency, course type, duration, language, target audience, and metadata inferred from course title/description when explicit metadata is incomplete
  • Course attendance / completion data — completed courses are filtered out; historical attendance can help calibrate which types of employees a course is relevant for 
  • Language preference — in Career Navigator learning recommendations, preferred-language courses are surfaced first, with English as fallback

On the specific attributes you asked about

Attribute

Used?

Notes

Skill gaps

Yes

Core signal; especially for Skill Gaps feed and Career Navigator course suggestions

Location

Yes

Used in improved recommendation calibration / matching

Education

Some evidence, but not emphasized in latest docs

A discovery transcript mentions education among profile attributes considered, but the latest product/admin docs emphasize role, experience, skills, proficiency, interests, and org context more strongly

Job title / current role

Yes

Current role/title and career-interest roles influence recommendations

Job descriptions

Indirectly

The docs don’t frame raw job descriptions as a primary direct signal for course recs. Instead, role skills/role context from Talent Design/job architecture and course title/description-derived skills are used

Job family/function / BU / job code

Yes

Explicitly used for organizational context and course calibration

Course descriptions

Yes

AI can infer course skills and difficulty from course titles/descriptions when metadata